Is morality dead?

I would like to ask our politicians a question… "Just what on earth do you regard as immoral?"

It's a simple question, but we all know that politicians 'duck' answering questions. They are professional at it. My guess is that they would answer by justifying their take on issues such as homosexuality. Then they would attack those who take a stand against 'their view'. That's the way it is. Attack is the best form of defence, or in this case, avoidance.

A few years ago a cabinet minister was forced to resign. He'd sent a dodgy email and had to go. The fact that he was living with another man's wife, and had raised children by her played no part in the fiasco.

So, Adultery is not regarded as immoral.

More recently, a Lib Dem cabinet minister has resigned because he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar. The fact that he was syphoning off our money to give to his boyfriend has played some part in his going, he was doing it to hide his sexuality! There is a lot of sympathy out there for this guy. No one has spoken out against his perverse life style.

So, living a perverse (we are not supposed to say, 'perverted') life style is not regarded as immoral.

In this country we have one 'talent' that beats the world. No, it's certainly not football! It's very wide spread and we are better at it than all of Europe…Teenage pregnancy. Yes, our teenagers are beating the world at getting pregnant, and the government's response????? Teach 'em how to do it earlier. They are trying to have a go at 5 year olds now…Stupid or what!

So, sex outside of marriage is not regarded as immoral.

I stopped watching TV several years ago. You should try it, it cleanse your house out better than flash or Mr. Muscle! I can remember seeing scenes of town high streets at 3am where the clubs are letting out. Scenes of drunkenness beyond belief. The boys, (you can't call them men) are aggressive, fighting and swearing a lot, and the girls, (again, you can't call them ladies) are behaving like sluts. This is another area where we score really high on the crapometer of the world. And the government's response??? Change the licensing laws so that alcohol is available 24-7! Beggars belief!

So, getting drunk and behaving violently and indecently in public is not regarded as immoral.

I have never gambled and never will. There are stories out there of broken homes, destroyed families and many suicides because of gambling. It's an addiction as powerful as heroin. What was the last Labour governments response???? To build a bunch of 'super' casinos! Well, they tried, but common sense prevailed. However, we still have gambling all over the place: horses, dogs, football…Oh, and the lottery.

So, gambling is not regarded as immoral.

There's a famous area in London called Soho. It's the place where low life's have their 'businesses'. Strip clubs and the like. A more recent offshoot being lap dancing. There are plenty of magazines and a few papers (can't call them news papers) that are full of filth. Freeview TV has a few xxx rated channels available, and the internet of course, I don't need to even go there. Porn is a huge business and that's why they don't even try to stop it. The Lib Dems have embraced (pun intended) a woman who is proud to announce that she makes porn films. And Cameron has jumped into bed with them!

So, porn is not regarded as immoral.

Another area which should sicken any decent human being is the area of abortion. Thousands of unborn babies are murdered mercilessly in our country every year. They call it, "A woman's right to choose." We all agree that a woman has a right to her own body. She has the right to not get pregnant against her will. She has the right to not be forced to have intercourse against her will. She has the right to live if having the baby will kill her. No one disputes these things. But abortion is not a right, no woman has the right to kill another human being. It's enshrined in law. Killing another is a no no, unless they are as yet unborn of course, then it's OK. Again, we have a liberal to thank for this. David Steel fought long and hard to get this many kids slaughtered and he is admired for it. Half the country was up in arms about the killing of Foxes using dogs, but very few are protesting the murder of defenceless babies by men using metal instruments to rip them piece by piece out of the womb.

So, the slaughter of the unborn is not regarded as immoral.

I repeat my question, Just what do politicians regard as immoral?

We have a right to be governed by people who are honest, decent and moral. I wonder how many of our politicians measure up?

Climate change??????

Is anyone else sick of all the hype about climate change? Well I am. There's a very easy, scientific way to know for sure what the climate is doing…Any takers? It's to measure the temperature every day over a period of, say, fifteen years, and then collate that data into a graph and Bob's your uncle, you have it. The truth, by measurement, not interpretation, not theory, not computer models, not downright guess work! No, actual measurements of actual temperature.

"Fifteen years is an awful long time," I hear you say, "do we have to?" Well you do if you want the truth, and not the hype we're getting stuffed down our throats right now. But it's alright, someone else has done it for you…Yes, the Met Office has been measuring temperature for decades. "Then they should know if the 'global' is warming…" Yes they do, and have done all throughout this whole charade. Have they used this data in the global warming debacle? No.

"Well tell us then, is it warming or isn't it?" The answer is, both! Yes there's been a little warming, but also, a little cooling, and the two cancel each other out, so, NO THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING!

You have to admit, it's a brilliant piece of con artistry. They'll be able to rip us off for years now!

I refer you to the article below, lifted from the CreationResearch.net web site.

CLIMATEGATES TOP SCIENTIST ADMITS NO GLOBAL WARMING SINCE 1995, according to BBC News 13 Feb 2010 and Daily Mail 14 Feb 2010. Professor Phil Jones (now ex-head of East Anglia Climate unit), is the leading scientist under investigation following the "Climategate" email and data leak, admitted on a BBC News interview, there has been no significant global warming since 1995. When asked: "Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming? Jones answered: "Yes, but only just. I also calculated the trend for the period 1995 to 2009. This trend (0.12C per decade) is positive, but not significant at the 95% significance level." When asked if the trend from 2002 to the present was one of cooling Jones said: "No. This period is even shorter than 1995-2009. The trend this time is negative (- 0.12C per decade), but this trend is not statistically significant."

When asked whether the rate the most recent period of warming from 1975 to 1998 was no different from previous periods of increasing temperature, i.e. 1860-1880 and 1910-1940, Jones admitted the warming rates were "similar and not statistically significantly different from each other." This is an important admission because the earlier warming periods are considered to be from natural processes, not man-made.

Jones and an American colleague Michael Mann, had a large part in producing the now discredited"hockey stick graph" which showed no signs of the well documented Medieval Warm Period and indicated the recent warming was unprecedented over the last thousand years. This was used by the IPCC to convince politicians that current warming was a dangerous man-made phenomenon.

Jones admitted the MWP occurred in the Northern Hemisphere and was as warm as the current period but said there was not enough data from the tropics and southern hemisphere to say it was a global. He admitted: "Of course, if the MWP was shown to be global in extent and as warm or warmer than today (based on an equivalent coverage over the NH and SH) then obviously the late- 20th century warmth would not be unprecedented."

Jones still believes the current warming is unprecedented and is caused by man-made factors. Jones and some of his colleagues at the University of East Anglia climate centre have been found guilty of ignoring legal Freedom of Information requests for data from the centre, and Jones has confessed to not keeping records in any usable form and that the data used to promote man-made global warming may have been lost. (Surprise surprise! My comment)

BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8511701.stm

Daily Mail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250872/Climategate-U-turn-Astonishmentscientist-centre-global-warming-email-row-admits-data-organised.html

Creation Research ED. COM. A trend of minus 0.12 degrees C per decade equals 0.096 degrees cooling over the last eight years. That may not seem significant, but it is the opposite of the politicians' and popular media's dire warnings of unrelenting heating. No wonder Jones and colleagues didn't want the data to be released into the public domain, even if they haven't lost any of it.

Jones is partly right about the Medieval Warm Period lack of data from the tropics and southern hemisphere for that period, as groups such as the aboriginals in Australia and most natives throughout the Pacific region have no written accounts of any time period. However a recent article in Science, vol. 324, p78, 3 April 2009 presented "globally distributed proxy data" for the past 947 years indicating the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age that followed were associated with changes in massive ocean currents involving both hemispheres. In the meantime masses of money, media hype and politicians' promises are being wasted propping up a theory founded on data that has been manipulated into discredited graphs and may no longer exist.

With recent revelations of mistakes by the IPCC, and regional raw data being reanalysed, the global warming facade is cracking, but don't start cheering yet. Politicians, media managers and carbon traders will not easily give up the power and money that comes with global warming alarmism. Instead, we should be humbling ourselves before our Creator, who is in charge of the climate, and getting on with the things we can do to be good stewards of the earth. (Ref. weather, politics, climate change)