I'm a big fan of scifi. Not the dark violent stuff though. When I write, it's nearly always scifi, can't help it.
With all this in mind, I've discovered that scientists like scifi too. Their problem is, they don't know it. Take the 'big bang' for instance. Pure science fiction. Why? No evidence. Really, zero evidence, just lots of fanciful theories from guys with more imagination than sense.
Scenario two...Evolution. Pure science fiction. Again, zero evidence. Don't believe me right? Don't blame you, scientists make great preachers, and their perpetual message, life just happened...Er, somehow. No scientist can tell you how. They guess, but their guesses are not based on actual evidence. This will surprise you, all the evidence they cite points directly to creation, without exception. Take any evidence they quote and it points straight to creation. They just refuse to see it. And if they do see it, they refuse to accept it, and there's the rub. If they accept it, they have to deal with God, and science refuses point blank to even consider God as part of the equation. Given all the evidence of His existence, this is the height of stupidity and human arrogance. Man just has to find his own answer, no matter how pathetic that answer may be.
The really crap thing about all this is that they insist on teaching this science fiction in schools. They may as well teach Star Trek for all the good it does our kids. If it came to a court of law, any judge would throw the case out for lack of evidence. The Bible, on the other hand, is an eye witness account. Dictated by the One Who was there and committed the act of creation. And science, for all its brains has never been able to break it in any way. They never will either.
You may be interested to know that several scientists have set out to disprove the Bible. They all ended up becoming Christians. One, Keller, wrote a book called, The Bible As History.
So, Big Bang...Big joke. Evolution...No scientist can find the start of it. The best they can do is put question marks on their 'tree charts' at the point where evolution should be.
So enjoy your science fiction, whether it be Star Trek, or big bang. ET, or evolution. They are all just science fiction.
Showing posts with label evolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label evolution. Show all posts
Sunday, 4 July 2010
Saturday, 26 June 2010
Who's the Chump?
'Ere our Agatha and say 'ello to yer great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great great, great, great,grand dad!
Yeah, like you're descended from me? Pull the other one!
Friday, 21 May 2010
This made me laugh
Got this from a radio interview last night...
Seems an American team have created a synthetic living cell. The inventor was very clear (for a scientist) that this was NOT creation of life, but a synthetic cell that could divide and so replicate itself. Quite an achievement.
Another scientist (not an American) was interviewed after and asked, "Is this playing God?" Don't you just love these dumb questions! Well listen to this dumb answer...
The guy said, "Well, it just proves the theory of evolution and that random chance can create life..."
RANDOM CHANCE?????
What a plonker. It took a team of top scientists 15 years to DESIGN the whole thing, and they used already EXISTING LIFE as a foundation on which to BUILD their experiments until THEY succeeded.
Makes you wonder, are they that thick before they go to university, or do they learn it whilst they are there.
P L O N K E R
Seems an American team have created a synthetic living cell. The inventor was very clear (for a scientist) that this was NOT creation of life, but a synthetic cell that could divide and so replicate itself. Quite an achievement.
Another scientist (not an American) was interviewed after and asked, "Is this playing God?" Don't you just love these dumb questions! Well listen to this dumb answer...
The guy said, "Well, it just proves the theory of evolution and that random chance can create life..."
RANDOM CHANCE?????
What a plonker. It took a team of top scientists 15 years to DESIGN the whole thing, and they used already EXISTING LIFE as a foundation on which to BUILD their experiments until THEY succeeded.
Makes you wonder, are they that thick before they go to university, or do they learn it whilst they are there.
P L O N K E R
Tuesday, 26 January 2010
What are the odds?
Had this on my mind for a while now, see what you think.
I am not a gambling man, never have been, never will be. I have great sport with cold callers who try to sell me insurance. I tell them I don't gamble which usually stops them in their tracks, at least for a few seconds. Once recovered they put up a fight, but I tell them, "The only thing guaranteed in insurance is that I will pay the premium every month." Nothing else is guaranteed, that's a gamble.
So, where's all this going? Well, lots of people gamble on the lottery, they buy tickets faithfully every week in the hopes that their luck will be in. And to make sure they do, every so often, a big winner splashed up in the media to keep 'em hooked. After all, "IT COULD BE YOU." ( Cue big bass voice!)
The odds of winning the lottery are in the order of 2,000,000 to one. That's two million to one against, yet people flock in droves to buy their tickets. Sad really when you think about it.
As we are into numbers, let's look at another 'hot potato', Evolution, which is taught in our schools as fact. What are the odds that evolution is true? Well, Borel's law of probability states that if the odds of something happening are worse than 1*10^50 (that's 1 with 50 zeros after it), then that event will never happen. It's impossible... Interesting.
So, what are the odds against evolution? Dr. Harold Morowitz, a former professor at Yale University, estimated the probability of the formation of the smallest, simplest form of life known is 1*10^340,000,000. That's one with three hundred and forty million zeros after it. Just a few more than 50 wouldn't you say! It gets better...The well known atheist and evolutionist, Carl Sagan, estimated it at 1*10^2,000,000,000. That's one with two billion zeros after it. Definitely more than 50, and yet, he still 'believed' in it. Some faith!
If a figure with 50 zeros after it represents impossibility, and these staggering numbers above are the odds against the 'simplest' form of life even starting, what are the odds against a single cell 'thing' becoming a human being?
What are the odds that God created the heavens and the earth, and all life? Well, either He did, or He didn't. I make that 50/50, or one in two. Now, hands up if you'd buy a lottery ticket if your chances of winning where one in two! So, why do seemingly intelligent scientists cling to the myth of evolution in the face of such staggering odds, and why does the education system insist on force feeding it to our kids when it is plainly, by mathematical proof, impossible?
WHY?
I am not a gambling man, never have been, never will be. I have great sport with cold callers who try to sell me insurance. I tell them I don't gamble which usually stops them in their tracks, at least for a few seconds. Once recovered they put up a fight, but I tell them, "The only thing guaranteed in insurance is that I will pay the premium every month." Nothing else is guaranteed, that's a gamble.
So, where's all this going? Well, lots of people gamble on the lottery, they buy tickets faithfully every week in the hopes that their luck will be in. And to make sure they do, every so often, a big winner splashed up in the media to keep 'em hooked. After all, "IT COULD BE YOU." ( Cue big bass voice!)
The odds of winning the lottery are in the order of 2,000,000 to one. That's two million to one against, yet people flock in droves to buy their tickets. Sad really when you think about it.
As we are into numbers, let's look at another 'hot potato', Evolution, which is taught in our schools as fact. What are the odds that evolution is true? Well, Borel's law of probability states that if the odds of something happening are worse than 1*10^50 (that's 1 with 50 zeros after it), then that event will never happen. It's impossible... Interesting.
So, what are the odds against evolution? Dr. Harold Morowitz, a former professor at Yale University, estimated the probability of the formation of the smallest, simplest form of life known is 1*10^340,000,000. That's one with three hundred and forty million zeros after it. Just a few more than 50 wouldn't you say! It gets better...The well known atheist and evolutionist, Carl Sagan, estimated it at 1*10^2,000,000,000. That's one with two billion zeros after it. Definitely more than 50, and yet, he still 'believed' in it. Some faith!
If a figure with 50 zeros after it represents impossibility, and these staggering numbers above are the odds against the 'simplest' form of life even starting, what are the odds against a single cell 'thing' becoming a human being?
What are the odds that God created the heavens and the earth, and all life? Well, either He did, or He didn't. I make that 50/50, or one in two. Now, hands up if you'd buy a lottery ticket if your chances of winning where one in two! So, why do seemingly intelligent scientists cling to the myth of evolution in the face of such staggering odds, and why does the education system insist on force feeding it to our kids when it is plainly, by mathematical proof, impossible?
WHY?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)